Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Applicants after serving their Rr 4 (l) (b) (ii), 5 & 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 2 (a) and 4 Compulsory Retirement Mandatory Retirement with a large penalty showcase notice. Was imposed on Inquiries against them alleging that they had allocated the wrong amount of tuition fees that were to be deposited in the bank, while the court's mind was not applied at the time of initiating the disciplinary proceedings and no investigations were made on which the appellant. In view of To deny the allegations and the circumstances of the case, it was important that the case of the appellant to disclose his innocence was not considered, but in these circumstances, the punishment for the appellant was not upheld. The appellant, who, had already reaped his pension benefits. Essentially after retirement, he ceased to be a civil servant and was not entitled to rehabilitation, it was not just the fact that the appellant received pension benefits, but not even after the retirement penalty was imposed. The appellant shall remain a Government servant in view of Section 2 (0) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973, which states that the Tribunal's impugned order has been fixed. After giving the appellant every opportunity of hearing, the law remanded a regular inquiry case against the appellant, meanwhile, he was ordered to be reinstated. \ r \ n immigration advocates phone number from Chak Sawara lawyer