Find a Lawyer

WAJID ALI versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH AND 5 OTHERS

Rr 3 (1) (b) & 4 (1) (b) (iii) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), after the removal of section 4 appellants from their jobs, they were to be charged and investigated against them in certain proceedings. Was removed from the job. The main allegation of misconduct was that he was the principal in charge of a school, had allocated tuition fees in large sums, embezzled and made illegal appointments of teachers, this was proved against the appellant as well. It was also proved that he had withdrawn the money in the form of telephone charges, but he failed to deposit the same amount in the bank and the school's telephone was disconnected due to his failure. In a similar fashion, the appellant had also misused the appellant on a large scale during the proceedings of the inquiry, confessed to his crime, and according to his written custody, misappropriated the amount in the installments. Had promised to return, but never fulfilled his promise, according to his promise never to be paid in installments or in installments. The appellant of the preliminary charges and the full, fair, reasonable and reasonable opportunity to prove his innocence, but he failed to do so, under the circumstances, could not say that he had to defend himself and prove his innocence. No opportunity was provided. Principal in charge of the school, who failed to maintain the latest record of receipt and payment according to the prescribed procedures, had been charged with serious financial misconduct and irregularities, which called for retaliation. In addition, the finances are illegal and irregular famous supreme court advocate from Kunjah lawyer