Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAFFER ABBASI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS

Section 9A Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Return to Appeal Against Exchange Lok Punctuality, Applied Applicant's Principle Acting as Deputy Secretary (Regulations) in Sindh Public Service Commission Was transferred to Sindh Provincial Secretariat where he remained in various departments for more than 5 years and then transferred and posted as Deputy Secretary (Budget) in the Department of Services and General Administration. Was = due to the appellant's good and good performance, he was permanently transferred to the service and the department The Rail Administration said that while the transfer department was satisfactorily performing its duties, it said that its permanent sentiment in the department was canceled by notification and they were sent to their home department / Sindh Public Service Commission homeland. Was sent back. The notification under which the appellant was transferred was disposed of by Ranfrey, legally and, legally, after its operation, which had a valuable right to appeal which could not be snatched up under the doctrine of \ locus poenetti tr. Appellant was not provided with any show cause notice or the possibility of a personal hearing before being rescued or withdrawn. The information under which he was returned home, if any order was passed without hearing and without informing the party whose presence was otherwise deemed necessary by the concerned authorities. Then it was said, this order would be a rebellion in the eyes of the law, which has been assigned to withdraw the notification. Under this the appellant transferred the department Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sita Road lawyer