Find a Lawyer

DR. MRS. ZEENAT ISMAIL AND OTHERS versus INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Section 2 (A), 2 (AA), 3E and 4 Appellate Tribunal Response Institute challenged the tribunal to entertain, hear and decide the appeals filed by the appellants against their complaints. The jurisdiction was challenged that it was an educational institution, and was not doing anything in relation to the affairs of the province and it was established only for the purpose of obtaining degrees, in addition, the provincial government was responsible for the respondents. Did not own or take control of any part of The circumstances cannot be considered a public servant under section 2 (a) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 and the validity of the appeals cannot be retained, except that the defendant institute was established by the provincial law, the provincial He was in control of the government and the whole. The administration also deals with the provincial government employees of the respondent institute, it is understood that they are civil servants for the purpose of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 and the terms and conditions of services decided by the tribunal Sindh service tribunals. The Act was to be made under the provisions of the 1973 Act, in the circumstances, having the jurisdiction to entertain, hear and decide. Appeals filed by appeals property advocates from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer