Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, FOOD AND CO-OPERATION, KARACHI

Rr 3 (1) (a), 4 (l) (a) (iv), 5 (6) and 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Government due to negligence or violation of orders. Compensation for Damages Appellant who served as Inspector Cooperative Society was sued by the department for gross negligence and breach of trust in the execution of official duties and the appellant was accused of being a government Due to negligence and negligence in the performance of the obligations, the blockade occurred and this appellant intentionally damaged the cooperative farm service center for which he was personally responsible for the inquiry. Fysr that he was found guilty of this charge, along with others in his appeal to a report they are responsible individually or jointly take individual loss. And on the basis of this report allegedly responsible for the payment of money, the appellant was awarded a fine for the payment of the money which caused the loss to the Government, in both inquiry reports, Appellant's Number where a parallel and separate inquiry proceeding was initiated against the Appellant in violation of the records of the Sindh Civil Employees (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules, 1973, revealed that the appellant's All the retaliation proceedings were initiated, and the result was concluded. The purpose of the flagging of the Sindh Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1973 was to record the evidence of witnesses on both sides, and both copies were linked to documentary evidence and the inquiry officer had to make his own inquiry into the crime. We had to form an opinion. registration advocate from Jaja Abasian lawyer