Rr 4 (l) (b) (i) and the 5 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), the reduction of the rank of 4 rank, the reduction in the range on the appellant after issuance of notice to the appellant Has been severely punished. As a police officer, he was sent to investigate the accused under the trial, but an inquiry officer was subsequently named to investigate the case, which recorded the statements of 9 witnesses, but among them None of the appellants have been involved in such inquiry reports, to be used as a piece of evidence against the applicant, the appellant's prosecution was brought on the complaint of the alleged victim of torture, But it was stated that the appellant besides the complainant was also nominated and no suit was filed against the appellant. A preliminary investigation was to collect nor was a formal inquiry. The order to arrive at a reasonable conclusion is whether the appellant was guilty of the charges against him or not? Empagged orders were not executable on the basis of such hypothetical reports as was noted in the Shockaz Notice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
