Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Service Appellants were dismissed on charges that their PTC teacher appointment was fake. That he prepared bogus appointment orders under the signature of the Deputy District Education Officer and that he had committed fraud with the Dispatch Register of the Department, which has a record of sending appointment orders and shows that the relevant The order of appointment against the number was issued in the name of the other person and the appellant. The fraudster had made appointment orders against the same number in his favor. Appellant's name was not included in the merit list of selected candidates; record-based appellant's appointment confirmed that the appellant was not posted at the school and did not attract him. When the Appellant did not withdraw any salary for a long time in the respective year at any salary at the place of his first posting, there was no doubt that the appellant had prepared the dated appointment order and so on. As such, he was able to transfer to another school. Many orders were based on fraudulent and unlawful grounds, the appellant could not claim any right kind o Continue on the basis of such illegal orders. Could not be removed from the job, in the circumstances he was rightly removed from service. famous high court advocate from Tarbela lawyer