Find a Lawyer

MUBASHIR AHMAD versus DIRECTOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (COLLEGES) PUNJAB, LAHORE

R21A (3) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4, retired from the post of retirement service tribunal on the date of birth of the appellant on the date of birth of the appellant. The seniority list, which was 18 2 1945, appellant confirmed the date of birth as per the dispute that the date of birth of the appellant as per the Middle School Certificate and Matric Certificate was 15 4 1949 and the same date was announced by the appellant at the time of his appointment. According to R-21 of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Service Regulations) Rule 1974, the date of birth in the seniority list was not final as the seniority list was prepared several years after joining the government service. Appellant was appointed Lecturer and was admitted to the Service by the Public Service Commission Middle and Matriculation Certificate and all other documents contained in the date of the Appellant's Department, but the Article Law Order, 1984 Article Despite the provisions of clause (g) of 129 that failed to provide many opportunities but provided evidence that could have been, but was not presented, it would be considered that the person who withheld these authorities. He was deliberately stopping the preparation of documentary evidence, thus assuming that the authorities claim that the birth wire The date was 1818 1945, the birth date of the applicant without the legs, which was entered in the public service under R21A (3) of the Punjab Civil Servant (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974. At the time of joining and not the number of years listed in the list made on the sanitary list, appellant's retirement basis. lawer from fb area from Mangi lawyer