Find a Lawyer

MRS. ASIFA PERVEEN versus PRINCIPAL, PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SCHOOL MONTGOMERY ROAD, LAHORE

RR 4 (1) (B) (V), 5, 6 and 7 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1999 on the charge of dismissal of Section 4 Service Appellant. The charger was sheeted under. Misconduct; Investigation Officer on Contemporary Fraud and Fraud found that the underlying allegation of embezzlement was not proved against the appellant, but other charges against it, such as corruption, assumption and fraud, were proved by the appellant. Was also awarded with a huge dismissal of employment that the authority did not agree with the inquiry recommendations. The appellant authority's mandatory retirement officer, although privileged to agree with the inquiry officer's recommendations, but when the authority did not corrupt the inquiry officers, generally, should have accepted the inquiry officer's recommendations. Appellant was of the view that action was being taken. The corruption against him led to his initiation, if he had anything to do according to the law strictly and not in anger and did not turn to the new law of disciplinary action after the conclusion of the inquiry. Approved and the case remanded. Alleg r \ n \ r \ nAppeals against the appellant in the same charge, including a detailed investigation by an independent officer, to the relevant authority for fresh action. us immigration advocates from Hala lawyer