Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ-UL-HAQ, ASSISTANT EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, LAHORE versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, LAHORE

RR 4 and 7 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Two-year increment withholding fines were applied to some people when they accused the appellant of selling poisonous liquor in the city, Which was the Assistant Excise and Tax Tax. Officer, was it that he and the accomplices failed to properly monitor the activities of the licensors in the manufacture of intoxicants / alcohol and to appellant and other accused for the arrest of the Inquiry Officer? Failed to take the necessary steps, which led to an investigation against the inquiry. The appellant recommends proceedings against the appellant because there was no evidence of appellant's association with the culprits or any disqualification authority on his part did not agree with the inquiry officer and the appellant. Illegal fines were awarded Appellant Appellant was not provided with appropriate support staff and other facilities that could affect the sale and use of illegal alcohol in the Area District Officer, an Excise and Taxation Officer. Practical action was equally guilty of, but legal action against What is not done primarily in the jurisdiction of law and order is the agency's manufacture of illicit alcohol was found in an area not under the control of the appellant. Authorities did not provide a satisfactory answer that the death had occurred, according to the Chemical Examiner's report that alcohol and excessive use of methyl alcohol led to the control of alcohol and the Department of Excise and Taxation. famous supreme court advocate from Daulat Pur lawyer