Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALI versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (M-EE), LAHORE

RR4 (b) (iv) 5 and 6 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), removal of section 4 service, locus punctuality, charge sheet of the applicable appellant and investigation against them under false allegations. Was removed from the job after. The appellant was accused of appointing and mismanaging the appellant for failing to establish himself as a PTC teacher, while he neither applied for the post nor was he interviewed. Was taken and was not chosen by any selection committee. Opportunity to defend himself by the Department but he failed to substantiate his appointment as PTC Teacher when there was no appointment made on the date alleged by the Appellant and the Record / Dispatch Register Accordingly, the appointment of another person was made against the alleged dispatch number and later the appointment was also canceled on suspicion when many orders were suspected and illegal, the principle of `Luxe Positivety 'cannot be quoted as such. No right to continue in the service can be obtained due to illegal orders of the appellant and the appellant PTC teacher. As a result, he was able to get his appointment with some dishonest elements in the department while he was never selected for the appointment. Dismissed against dismissing any qualification and removal from employment \ r \ n property advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer