MUHAMMAD AMJAD BUTT versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE) NAROWAL
R. (I) (B) (iii) In the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Revenue Department has taken action against the appellant for compulsory retirement and he has been charged. Mandatory retirement conviction. An unauthorized absence from duty alleged that the charge sheet was issued against him, he was never served, and when he received a notice of personal hearing, the appeal. In view of the nature of the penalties imposed on the debtor and the nature of the charges against him, the competent authority was responsible for filing a response to the charge sheet. The appellant was not allowed to present evidence in his defense. The interlocutory order was set aside and ordered to be returned to the matter authority. De Invoke inquired into the matter and said that due to the inquiry a new order should be passed in accordance with the law in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer
