Find a Lawyer

GHARIB ALAM, A.S.-I. TRAFFIC POLICE versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HEADQUARTERS TRAFFIC PUNJAB, LAHORE

R 4 (1) (b) (i) The Punjab Service Tribunal Act (IX of 1974), enforcing a major reduction in Section 4 rank, was carried out by the Senior Superintendent of Police, who appellant while pursuing a truck on a highway mobile. Was, himself, issued a show cause notice to the appellant and subsequently, from the Sub Inspector to the Assistant Sub Inspector due to this major penalty, without any regular inquiry against him, to impose a substantial fine on the public servant. Prior to this, there was a regular inquiry to investigate the matter as there was no formal inquiry against the appellant before it was imposed, so A sentence reduction hdy Senior Superintendent of Police, who is the key witness in the case of the appellant, the prosecutor and the judge. The decision of the Deputy Inspector General of Police's appeal after the inquiry by another police officer, the passing of the order will not remove the scope of the scope. The impugned orders of the authorities against the appellant were set aside by the conviction of D and the remand was granted to the Senior Superintendent of Police (Headquarters) under the trial, under which the appellant's rules Regular investigations should be directed against this and further action should be taken in this matter. Law when you need a advocate from Kakul lawyer