MUJIB-UR-REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, KARACHI
The R12 (A) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), under the List of Service Tribunal Seniors through the list of seniority provisions of Appeal Section 4, stated that the respondents were named after the appellant and above. Yes, he is then taking advantage of departmental treatment, which is unknown, he appealed to the service tribunal alleging that the defamatory seniority list was illegal and invalid because he was of age. The higher the respondent will give the senior position, both the appellant and the defendant authority initially appointed on the same date But six days after appellant joined him, the respondent appellant, though older, was older than the respondent, but the latter had joined the department before the appellant, under which circumstances the respondent appellant. Was senior to and would remain serious even if both were later transferred to another department. The seniority, otherwise, had no jurisdiction, in which case, it did not commit any kind of illegal or malicious act of keeping the appellant and the above respondents in the seniority list.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
