Find a Lawyer

QAIMUDDIN MANGI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

RR 3 (2), 7 and 8 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Retrospective Promotion, Claims for Service Tribunal Appellant, who was appointed as Junior Instructor (B17), during his service. Passed the Tech. In 1983, appellant was promoted as a lecturer (B17) in 1975 and at his own discretion his cadre was changed to Senior Instructor (B17) on 27 198 1986 and on 1 7 1992 he was promoted to four level. Under the formula B18 was developed. And then developed on a regular basis in B18 on 5 5 1994 and was promoted as Assistant Professor (B 19) under the Four Level Formula on 12 12. In 2002, the appellant promoted his former promotions B 18 and B. 19 to 30 was applied from 1986 to 1986 and was promoted in accordance with recruitment rules, 1984, respectively, in 1 7 1992, with only a bachelor's degree in engineering in the relevant subject, Head of Department. / Assistant Professor Appellant was entitled to be considered for development. Degree B-Tech (Hons) in relevant time, while all private respondents, who were promoted, had the required degree in engineering when the Bachelor's degree in Engineering was developed, Appellant was given five years. Was less experienced, which was also an example. Appellant's claim for promotion to the post of B18 For promotion of B 18 wef 30 4 1986 and B 19 W to 1 in 1992, was not workable under the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n solicitors from Hala lawyer