Find a Lawyer

MRS. ATIA KHATOON versus THE EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), NAWABSHAH

Section 18 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Salary Appeal Appellant was appointed which after completion of all the Kodal formal process, appellant completed the required training, his service books were maintained, he was given GP. Fund numbers were allotted and deducted. After four years of service in salaries, appellants' salaries were withheld on the order of the Army Monitoring Cell, suddenly without any reason and written order. Appellants served the department for more than 4 years and were paid, and received necessary training. During his service, the authorities did not say that the appellants were not performing their duties or were dismissed or dismissed from their jobs, which was neither legal nor appropriate, causing There has been a serious breakdown of the orders of justice. Appellants' salaries were set aside to withhold and they were instructed to release their salaries as well as all liabilities \ r \ n \ r \ n family advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer