Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The R77 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 of the Non-Gazette Officers were working in Appeal Tribunal Appeals Retraction 15b, and on submitting the policy on the move, they were given a B16. Was allowed to move Once they reached the maximum limit of B16, they were allowed to move from B16 to B17. After about 5 years, the government withdrew orders to give appellants another action under separate orders. Due to this amount of excessive cash withdrawal, the wrong second action award should be made better than the appellant's monthly salaries. Was withdrawn on the basis, stating that no instructions had been issued for it. A subsequent letter from BS16 to BS17 revealed that it applies to gazetted officers from BS16 to BS19 and not to unregistered officers of BS1 to BS16, While the appellants were non-Rajput officers, appellants were legitimately approved on the advice of the finance department, which had not yet been called or withdrawn / withdrawn but the finance division's counsel. The field letter was kept, not recommended in any way. D that the subsequent move was not acceptable for non-Gazette employees without B16 to B17, the benefit of pay-overs found in the appellants' existence, the department was not authorized to implement the orders. / Only to withdraw after being enforced and entitled. The Appellants were formed in favor of Empan Pakistan, top advocate family court from Takhtbai lawyer