Find a Lawyer

MST. RIFAT ZHORA versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION) DISTRICT SANGHAR

R 4 (1) (b) (iii) Appointment of the Appellant's Services as designated as Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Stop; JST (BS9) Salaries were withheld, but on his representation, the appellant's salary was released and the other lady teachers were again withheld on the report of the Army Monitoring Team and their services were subsequently terminated on the charge that they were terminated. False documents were also made with other people. Validity Appellant was appointed by the Selection Committee against the vacancies to advertise in the press and was successfully deposed for the training which he successfully completed. He served more than seven years and did not give any reason for complaint, but his salary was withheld and he was removed from service authorities, neither in his written statement nor before the service tribunal. The reasons for the return of the buyer were explained. His irresponsible transfer of salary and then his transfer of services as a ghost teacher was condemned, the unwanted action against him was a deliberate and serious act, after which the appellant was brought to justice after being removed from the job without proper inquiry. Had suffered severe abuse. Withholding and removal of paid service against the Appellant was canceled and the Appellant was reinstated with all legal obligations \ r \ n how to become a advocate from Charsada lawyer