Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

RR 4 (1) (b) (i) and 5 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 ratification of a two-year forced penalty / adjudication of qualified service appeal against the appellant, who is deputy superintendent of prisons. Were serving as the , It was alleged that he had released a prisoner after taking bribe, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant, but without regular investigation against him for a full investigation into the matter. He was fined a great deal, neither the complainant nor the defendant's statement, which was allegedly released by the appellant, only on appeal based on the complaint made by the unrelated person. Was filed before the appellant, it was not proper, fair and reasonable to punish the appellant for a large fine. Rule inquiry was accepted there was a need to appeal and an appeal was made to order fines inaudible, in the circumstances, was placed separately \ r \ n \ r \ n law firms from Hattar lawyer