AZHAR GUL SOOMRO versus HON\'BLE HIGH COURT OF SINDH
RR 2 (4) and 4 (1) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 3B Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Sections 200 and 247 (XLV of 1860), Section 153 Service Civil Judge Removal of a Magistrate with nine (9) years' experience of gross misconduct and ineligibility, charges of private complaint, including recognizable and unauthorized offenses, in the exercise of powers under section 247 The arrest of the accused in such complaints by the civil judge, witnessing the PC under section 153A of the offense, direct complaint to the civil judge to acquit the PPC and then the accused persons. The civil judge acquitted the section 247, CR 195, in the presence of a clear bar in the PCC court on the basis of section 195; the PC had no jurisdiction in the matter. Respect for the offense under Section 153A, PPC, without complaint by an officer of the Central or Provincial Government, because jurisdiction was exercised in such cases. It was not stated that the conduct of the civil judge had clearly indicated that he had issued orders to him in good faith, knowing that he was doing wrong. In such cases the accused had no option to be acquitted or taken seriously. A civil judge had pleaded guilty to misconduct by department officials, a service tribunal dismissed the appeal in the circumstances. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
