Find a Lawyer

SAAD SALAM ANSARI versus CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

Section 4 (3) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Removal of Section 3B Service, Notice of issuance of judicial officer for serious, grave and disqualification was issued. Convicted the judicial officer. The competent authority issued a final showcase notice to the Judicial Officer and, after receiving the opportunity of a personal hearing, the employees taken by the Judicial Officer were removed from the job saying that they were fined without formal inquiry and Based on the responses filed to show only justification notices, the judicial officer's justification for misconduct was clearly clear, and there was no need to investigate the competent officer in connection with conducting regular investigations. Such a situation was fair, fair, reasonable and legally correct and the judicial officer was given a fair chance to explain and defend his position, which failed to defy the charge against him. That the action of the authority to impose the sentence of removal from his post was accurate, appropriate and according to the law, no unlawful interference or misconduct or violation of any right was found with the provisions of the law. Appeal dismissed in circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n female advocates from Khanpur lawyer