Find a Lawyer

NAHEED IQBAL versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, SINDH, KARACHI

R4 (1) (b) (iv) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), dismissing Section 4 of the Appellate Unit for punishment of a major penalty for dismissal of the appellant in his criminal case Was involved and arrested. Already his fate has been exhausted No departmental inquiries have been made against the appellant in connection with the criminal charge. The appellant's court appealed the appeal in which the appellant was convicted; in the circumstances, there was nothing available against the appellant's immunity judgment as well as against the inquiry report. The decision to seek effect should not be construed as law, in the absence of a Departmental Inquiry, it is important to consider that the order of appeal was imported and the matter to be considered in the bad judgment passed in favor of the appellant. After receiving the remand for passing the Speaking Order within the stipulated period. Investigation Officer Appellant's Departmental / Appeal Detection Demanded Also Delayed \ r \ n \ r \ n attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chishtian lawyer