Find a Lawyer

MEHR TEXTIL MILLS LTD. versus INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 305 and 309 Companies (Court) Rules, 1997, R76 Company Registration Notice, Appellant's Complaint of the Company's Registered Office Address Complaint Complaint Complaint's Notice of Complaint was not served. The changed address of the Registered Office of the Respondents Company was that the Appellants were regularly submitted by publication in two journals and that the Company was required to submit the same to the Company in accordance with R76 of Terms of Court (Rules 1997). Direct notice was issued. The company's registered office was required to send a notice to the company office via a minor post and, subsequently, a publication in newspapers in the area where the appellant operates his business, not such notice on appeal. Was given. Addresses were changed, instead of granting or denying relief to litigants on technical grounds by courts, decisions on merit cases were encouraged. This was done because advertisers were not given a proper opportunity to defend their actions. The verdict was heard by a company judge and the matter was referred to the company judge. The Supreme Court fixed a date for the decision in which the parties will appear. The company judge allowed them to appeal without issuing a notice. advocate from Cherat lawyer