Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus MST. HAMEEDAN BIBI

Sections 8 and 42 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) declaration of title and occupancy recovery, the recent discovery of the facts by the courts below the jurisdiction, asserts that the plaintiff's discretion is the owner of this claim and The defendant was his tenant, the trial court recognized the plaintiff's ownership of the suit property, but the suit appellate court partially allowed the appeal and ruled the case to the extent of the plaintiff's ownership, while the appellate court gave the plaintiff. The High Court has directed both courts to use the revised jurisdiction to refer the rent controller for the restoration of the occupied premises. The inquiry was upheld and the plaintiff Plaintiff's decision to keep the suit property was also approved by the High Court should be decided by the controller of the rent to leave the property case for more than a decade. And it was not only forcing the plaintiff to start a new litigation phase and thus encouraging the litigation and misconduct of the parties was not in the best interest of justice, especially when the Supreme Court's duty was fulfilled. ? The present findings of justice were not that the appeal was denied as a result of any misrepresentation of the evidence available on record. how to become a advocate from Qambar lawyer