Find a Lawyer

NIAZ MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL RAZZAK

Section 19 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Subversion of title mutation, Allotment of findings of facts by the courts below suit land allotted under the Guru Mode Food Scheme was done. The plaintiff, who sold the same to the plaintiff, entered in the name of the plaintiff, so in turn took the exception that the sale was the result of fraud and misrepresentation, and the testimony presented by the plaintiff in his case. I made no progress. Further agreement was reached in favor of the defendant in which he received Rs 5,000, the plaintiff himself had appointed a special lawyer for the execution of the sale deed and had submitted an application to the collector for permission to sell the disputed property. , The Revenue Officer wrote and contracted the plaintiff's statement on the basis of which the controversial variable was granted, in which case each act was done by either the plaintiff if either himself or his example had been adjudicated by the three courts. The plaintiffs had, respectively, dismissed the lawsuit filed by the trial court and the appellate court. All matters involved in this case were thoroughly defeated and the High Court gave its reasons for holding the same appeal hearing. Refused attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sambrial lawyer