Find a Lawyer

MIAN ABDUL QADEER versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 3 House Building Finance Corporation Service Regulations, 1957, Regulation No. 15 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 Senatorial Corruption A government employee was dismissed on charges of dismissal. The list was repeatedly represented, and eventually the authorities had the authority to correct the list, while the process of introducing such representation as a mismanagement was initiated and the government employee removed from the job (special powers). Dismissed under section 3 of the Ordinance, the order approved by the 2000 authorities was retained by the Service Tribunal Validity only because the civil servant continued to represent against the seniority list and was reinstated in 1998. From the date of the appointment, it cannot be concluded that he is gross misconduct, cohabitation and There was no evidence for the establishment of mismanagement and manipulation under the rules of utility and discipline against any of the authorized authority associates, no fraud, fraud and corruption. There were no allegations of fraud and no government employee was ever proven against the revised seniority list issued on 10 2 1990. The final position was obtained because the appeal against the representation of public servants was rejected by the Appellate Authority on 2 4 1992, the order of which was not assigned or amended by a superior executive authority. And he was not arrested in front of a judicial forum. Passed on and off by the Service Tribunal famous lower court advocate from Chilas lawyer