Find a Lawyer

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER versus HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ISHAQ AHMAD NOORI

Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Failure to freely consider the issue of return of appointment letters, compliance with the order passed by the government employees of the Supreme Court was appointed by the school teachers but the general order Upon release, their appointments were canceled. On the basis of the irregularities at the time of his appointment, the Supreme Court directed the officials to consider each matter independently and then decide on the matters of public servants so that the authorities approve the orders for prosecution on post-remand. , And maintain appeals filed by civil servants were once again accepted by the service tribunal and the cases were sent to the authorities for a re-decision. It was taken up by the authorities that these matters were considered independently and the service tribunal did not have the option of obtaining the remand of the cases for regular inquiry, orders in the post remand, name and number except one. In addition to the change, in all cases the orders were uniform in the sense that the competent authority had failed to exercise its mind freely on the facts of each case, the Service Tribunal had given a permanent authority to the regular employees He was correct in directing matters to be considered. The tribunal passed an inquiry order that was fair and appropriate and, according to the Supreme Court's first order, no interference was sought by the Supreme Court which was denied appeal \ r \ n \ r \ n when you need a advocate from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer