HABIB ULLAH versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR
Sections 17 (3) and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) determine the award of compensation in respect of gardens, the fact that a question is not satisfied with the land in respect of the gardens, the constitutional petition and the intra-court appeal, The applicant's reference to the award, which was rejected by the High Court's accuracy, was the legal method of reference, the determination of the compensation of trees under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was a question of fact regarding constitutional jurisdiction again. The decision could not be made. As already announced, the section 17 (3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was not violated; any unlawful or legal impairment in the decision to guarantee interference by the applicant Supreme Court Failed to identify.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Daska lawyer