S.M. AFZAL-UR-REHMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), dismissal of timely deposition of a government official, dismissed from employment and banned his departmental representation for 185 days before appeal to the service tribunal. Gone. The servant was that the letter of dismissal from the job was received by his brother, with which the civil servant was not subject to the proper conditions. If an individual had shown negligence and evil in prosecuting his treatment before the appropriate forum, The court was not entitled to refer the matter, extending it to 185 days, especially when it was not represented by the department itself, not using discretion in favor of the public servant, the tribunal neither There was no strong basis for illegal proceedings nor any unreasonable practice interference. At the discretion of the Tribunal, which was neither illegal nor illegal or unlawful after its departure, the Anti-Appeal was denied on time, dismissing the appeal of the Service, unless sufficient. For reasons, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to postpone the delay, the Service Tribunal ruled otherwise, in which the Supreme Court refused to take any exception, no leave on appeal was denied on the question of public importance law. Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
