Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus SAMINA MASOOD AND OTHERS

Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the Regulation 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 25 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 constitute jurisdiction to challenge the proposals of Regulation 25 of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation. Was done Under the Employees (Service and Discipline) Regulations, 1985, an air host was to be retired from time to time to increase the age of thirty-five. While his other colleagues were retiring at the age of sixty-five in Groups I to IV, such a difference in retirement age had already been challenged by several airlines before Karachi as well as the High Court. The difference is discrimination. The sex-based, gross violation of Article 25 (2) was brought by airlines in the dispute over the constitution raised by the airlines, mainly related to the terms and conditions of service. And that's why Section 2A, the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, treats Air Hosts before the Federal Service Tribunal and at the time of filing a constitutional petition by the High Court, no order was issued, whether Air Submitted by the Departmental Authority. Hosts were in the field under the consideration of Section 5, Service Tribunals Act, 1973 to challenge the retired Tribunal Age, determined by the registrar. n 25 was a term and condition but was not violated by the Department; if the Department had done so, then the Air Hosts had the right to challenge it before the Service Tribunal, the Departmental Authority or No order was approved by the original. Or solicitors from Lodhran lawyer