CADBURY PAKISTAN LIMITED versus QAZI ZAMIRUDDIN
Section 25A & 38 (a) Complaint Request Job Request for the purpose of counteracting certain documents for employment, the employer had rejected such request by the Labor Court; The response to the labor court documents in question was neither submitted by the employer with a counter-statement nor disclosed in the effectiveness of such documents only at a later stage. I can only submit that those who were not in the knowledge of the relevant parties and were later identified for their reasons. Bringing on their record will further the interests of justice if such documents attempt to alter or substitute the party's entire or partial application, which will not be allowed on the record, the documents in question. The employer will know from the very beginning. The litigation, but neither submitted nor disclosed is not allowed to be created for any purpose at the reversal stage, especially when the employer prepares the documents and creates a new application Wants to replace by new.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Tando Jam lawyer