TAJ BAKERY, JACKSON BAZAR versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Sections 1 (4) (a) and 2 (i) Application of Complaint, Impact of Retention of Complaint Notice Sales The non-working employee claimed that the complaint was sent to the employer, before the complaint was filed, but the employer refused to take notice of it, the employee claimed that it was an industrial relations ordinance, Compliance with Section 8A of 1969 is sufficient. The notice given under this section was forwarded to the employer because the dispute was canceled as Section 25A stated that the notice of complaint in writing to section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was sent to the employer's notice. Was brought. In connection with the service of notice to the employer, which was not complied with, the complaint filed by the employee was not retained; otherwise, at the time of his dismissal, he was working as a salesman and as a salesman. Labor, West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 They were not applicable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer