Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus MESSRS FAUJI SUGAR MILLS

Section 2 (xxviii) and Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O15 of 15 Service Complaint Petition Checkers, even on Establishment's workman officers. And the office was attacked. Instead of assuming responsibility, collective bargaining agents are responsible for the union and guardians, whose primary duty is to protect the establishment and the establishment's employees, in fellowship with criminals. Fully trusted employees were quickly dismissed. The court set aside the dismissal order, but the employees were free to conduct a domestic inquiry into the matter; the employees failed to take part in the inquiry process, they were dismissed once again, the Labor Court dismissed the employees. Dismissed the complaints filed against the employees working as watchmen, there were no laborers as there was no evidence brought on record to show that they engaged in manual or academic work. Even if employees are considered as workers, they should be able to perform their duties at the appropriate time. I was unsuccessful when officers and others were being attacked by union employees. Since there were no employees, the complaints filed by them were not viable and they could not request labor court jurisdiction for their rehabilitation purposes. famous high court advocate from Panjgur lawyer