Find a Lawyer

PHOENIX SECURITY SERVICES (PVT.) LIMITED versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) Determination of Employees Employing Employee Store The duty was dismissed after an inquiry against him acting as a cape and manual and clerk was challenged by the employee in his complaint requesting dismissal. Based on the allegation that the job was not maintained because the store keeper Nagar N was not. Manual or academic employment and that the employee is not an employee, his application was not a permanent version of the employee that he is an employee performing manual and academic duties, uncontested as he is not examined by the employer on this matter. Was done As its workers, its witnesses testified that even the employer's own witnesses testified that the employee was performing manual / scholarly labor court duties, in the circumstances, rightly so. It was concluded that the duties performed by the employee were maulvi / manual, his complaint request was legally upheld Employee's dismissal was based on the inquiry report made against him in the presence of the employee. I did not examine the employer's testimony and the employee was not provided with the appropriate opportunity to inspect them. Yash was not. In defending the truth of the inquiry, the employer failed to prove the charge against the employee which led to his dismissal. power of attorney advocate Sadiqabad lawyer