Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. versus WAHEED MURAD

Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O15 (3) (b), (4) Service Complaint Complaint Employees working as employee cashiers After being charged on the bank's charge sheet and two accountants' complaints against him, the employee was dismissed after the employee received a check from him and was terminated by an over draft. There was no money in the account and the employee did not pay the overdrafts to the theater, but instead the employee did the wrong thing. He was thoroughly knowledgeable, including some manual labor courts. In the circumstances, it was concluded that the employee was a laborer under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and West Pakistan. The Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance, 1968 charge sheet mentioning allegations of misappropriation of bank money, re-banned the inquiry employee was faulty as there was no evidence related to the facts. The bank's witnesses were presented before the inquiry officer for presenting only relevant records and were not cross-examined as important witnesses like the inquiry officer were not presented in evidence and escaped. ? Through the scrutiny of the evidence, the investigating complainants whose complaint inquiries were initiated were also not investigated, as was the statement of the employee recorded by the inquiry officer about receiving the checks from his fraud. Did not speak but did not establish any fraudulent collection of checks by the employee famous high court advocate from Daud Khel lawyer