MAHMOOD HUSSAIN versus COMMISSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (i) Request for a service complaint, care of the security guard, whether of the security guard A worker's services were terminated orally without any reason and without notice to the applicant; he filed a grievance request and in his affidavit in support of the grievance request and himself It was mentioned that he was performing the duties of a security guard and did not mention anywhere as a security guard. While he was performing any duty of labor, under the circumstances, it was well-known that the Security Guard was included in the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, in the definition of "laborer". Was not done Or because the Industrial Relations Ordinance was not a petitioner's labor in 1969, his complaint request was not heard.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer