Section 9 (c) Definition of Recovery Proof of Drugs Counterfeit Recovery, accused of planting the knowledge of the suspect, was the driver of the vehicle from which 72kg of hashish was recovered from secret palms, the trial court told the accused. He was sentenced and sentenced to seven years in prison. It was raised by the suspects that the prosecution did not disclose the culprits' knowledge about the presence of cannabis in the vehicle, from the drugs recovered, was sent to the forensic science laboratory for chemical analysis and the report received was positive. Nothing was brought to the record to prove it. The police could not put up with such huge amounts of money worth millions against the accused, there was no evidence to prove that any of the prosecution's witnesses had any previous animosity or dishonesty. It was alleged that he had falsely implicated him in this case. The driver of the motor vehicle in question at the time of questioning was under his control and in his possession whatever articles were in the vehicle. Was in control of the car and a large quantity of drugs were recovered from her car's secret palms, for which there was no other person. In addition, the accused can be charged, except the accused, who was driving his vehicle, not reading any false statements and evidence or finding any error in the decision which interfered with the High Court's jurisdiction. Can guarantee, the appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
