In section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 365B abduction guarantee, the complainant's grant did not, in his preliminary report, indict the accused for the abduction of his daughter, which was delayed by a daily diary of 2 days. Was later filed in section 6464, in his statement under CRPC, alleging that he had allegedly abducted his daughter along with his brother and mother, He did not provide a source of satisfaction for the suspect's involvement in his daughter's abduction, nor has the kidnapper been recovered. No evidence was collected by the investigating agency to reveal any link or link to the suspect from the mobile number from which the complainant allegedly received a call and heard his daughter's cry as to whether the alleged The kidnapper has escaped. His father's home was not answered on his own case or in any other way, after a record of the evidence by the prosecution during the trial, which made the case for the accused. The accused arguing for the purpose of bail was admitted on bail in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
