Find a Lawyer

WAGMA versus PERVEZ KHAN

Article 5, Schedule Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal for Recovery of the Applicant's Claim The plaintiff's petitioner acknowledged that Dover's money was paid by her husband, but her father mentioned Money has been deposited with you. The bank account and Atal for not paying it was a dispute between the daughter and the father and the husband could not be held liable, the family court had no jurisdiction and the matter was in the civil court, right for the plaintiff applicant. Had to approach The civil court was dismissed for the purpose of obtaining a constitutional petition

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• ISMAIL KHAN alias MAYAIL v. State 2013 YLR 1879
• NOOR SALAM v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2013 YLR 1883
• MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN v. FAZAL-UR-REHMAN 2013 YLR 1888
• MAQBALI KHAN v. State 2013 YLR 1895
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2013 YLR 1942
• Mst. HAMSHIDA v. UMAR SHER 2013 YLR 1952
• ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION v. BANARAS KHAN 2013 PTD 1988
• AJMAR ALI KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ALI 2013 YLR 1995

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

criminal advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes