Article 2 30b (b) Conan testimony (of 1984 of the ten), Article Q46 Defining the declaration of death of Qatil Ahmed, relying on Scope's death declaration for weaknesses and not independently influencing the accused. It was on the night of the incident that he was sitting at his bedside with the deceased, when they became agitated due to an affair and the accused was subjected to multiple pigs on the deceased. Reported the matter to the police, and involved the suspect in the crime. He died after the crime and died two days later at the hospital. The trial court sentenced the accused under Section 302 (b), PPC and sentenced him to death. The report and its author (the policeman), who appeared as the prosecutor's witness, then had no other version of the account. The statement of all witnesses to the litigation was only about the situation in which they were reported. It was that he and the accused spoke harshly on an issue and the accused attacked him with a dagger, which was not credible and understandable because they were both intellectuals, friends, and even otherwise they were very There were strange times in someone's bed, and the question was how suddenly the scene could change and the 18/19 year old boy could get the accused out. He was found in his dead friend's body several times with daggers or could not happen suddenly or somehow, and must have had some effect. The question was whether the accused had pulled the dagger from his pants (shalwar) or from somewhere else, usually in dungeons, until the contrary was proved.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
