A II, R 2 and Section 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) Articles 42 and 54 must each satisfy the claim that the plaintiff is in favor of the purpose of the scope suit for declaration in relation to income. Cause action. The record entries are requested by the defendants to exclude the claim that a similar case is pending due to the same proceedings and between the same party, therefore, this case is in line with the Res Judeta principle. He was also targeted by O II, R. 2, the CPC validity present suit was established on the basis of false entries in the Revenue Record, which were identified during the proceedings of the previous suit, which was a permanent injunction against the same land, and which came to Patwari. The statement of the constituent, therefore, could not be effected by the prevailing judiciary principle or by the provisions of O II, R 2 CPC could not be excluded from the case that was subsequently filed. ? And there was nothing illegal in the orders of the courts under various reasons for the action and in the various reliefs sought.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
