MUHAMMAD KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
Section 36 and 7 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), The proposed constitutional rejection on the basis of the ammunition of section 36 of the Colonization Government Lands (Punjab) Plaintiffs (Applicants) Rejected Their Claims on the Bar of Section 36 of the Colonization Under Unnecessary Order of Trial to Declare the Impact of the Scope Suite Act, 1912, had gone. The Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 argued that the petitioner / plaintiff's decision was that the trial court had acted quickly and should decide on the issue of merits. The validity record shows that the plaintiff was re-prosecuted under litigation as a litigant. Section 36 of the Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, when the tax authorities did not exercise their powers beyond their jurisdiction, the civil court did not have jurisdiction. Jurisdiction, and Section 7 of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act (v. 1912) is deemed to have been applied by the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, under the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912. , It was clearly considered that the orders approved by the collector were to be challenged before the Commissioner or before the Board of Revenue by a request for review and which could not be treated by law provided by the Civil Court. Yes, the courts needed to be abolished first. In the circumstances, there was nothing wrong with the unlawful orders
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
