ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION versus BANARAS KHAN
Sections 2 (s), 168, 156 (1), 181 and 196 of the Import and Export (Central) Act (Exxon X of 1950), Section 3 (3) Section RO 499 (I) / 2009, dated 13 6 2009 The absence of such vehicle import records in the smuggled vehicle, custody and customs data bank order of appellate tribunal issues this vehicle on payment of a penalty equal to 15% of its customs value, plus tax on revenue. Was imposed and it was an unreasonable order violation of Section RO 499 (I) / 2009 dated 13 6 2009 and no such release shall be granted nor shall the powers of the Adjudicator adjusting such Sec. Can reduce Nor will it be bound by the instructions / instructions contained therein, which must be adjudicated in view of any judicial function. At its discretion, the vehicle could be fined for confiscating a vehicle because relatives of the confiscated vehicle were auctioned at a nominal price for fake names to relatives and auction mafia relatives within the company. The vehicle would be more beneficial to the state than the forfeiture and auction on the payment of fines and extra duty and taxes, in such a secret manner that the Board amended such Section R and thereafter on the payment of exempt duty police. The release of non-paid vehicles operating in the country was allowed. The occupants of such vehicle were neither officers nor authorized to occupy the custody under the Customs Act 1969, except in the case of the seizure of such vehicle in the premises of SaxRO. The source cited his illegal occupation as unlawful requesting a reference in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
