SENIOR ENGINEER OPERATIONS, PTCL versus MASOOD AHMED
Removal of Sections 41 and 55 from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, (XVII of 2000), Section 3 (1) (b) and application of 10 complaints Appellant / Corporation introduced a voluntary separation scheme and the respondents / employee of others Together this scheme was chosen. Employees, but the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, took disciplinary action against the employee due to absence of duty under the provisions of the Punjab Removal Act of 2000, and imposed a substantial fine on the employee for retirement. Before the service tribunal and the corporation challenged the jurisdiction of the service tribunal on the basis that the corporation was privatized, the service tribunal accepted the corporation's objection that it had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The privatization was done and, therefore, was not subject to the removal of its employees. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, dismissing the appeal of the Weldati Service Tribunal employees, observed that the employee filed complaints before the relevant forum before the concerned forum, which was accepted by the Labor Court. It was reported that the employees were restored from the job, against which the corporation filed an appeal with a 17-day delay in which the delay was not detected. After the privatization of the corporation, its employees were neither government employees nor employees under the legal rules of service, they could not be left without any recourse and labor could be obtained through a complaint application. They could be welcomed in court. Exemption from employee complaints requests can lead to time constraints
