ANWAR-UL-HAQ versus PRESIDENT MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Section 41 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Request for Termination of Section O12 Service Employee who was arrested in a criminal case, was convicted and sentenced to five years Punishment services were terminated. As a result that his post cannot be vacated for five years, as a result, the employee was acquitted and released about five to five months after the employee's release, giving notice of complaint to employers and employees. Appealing to the employees who refused to settle the complaint, they filed a complaint, which was dismissed by the Labor Court for a delay of about four to four months, confirming the complaint. No inquiry is necessary in the case of the employee as he has never been prosecuted, nor has he been prosecuted. Volume was. There was no dispute about the service, nor the long absence of the employee's sentence, provided to employers their services under Section O12 (1) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 The reason for the termination, when investigative matters were stopped, was when the employee's services were terminated for any reason other than mismanagement. The complaint was filed within three months of the date of filing, whereas in the present case, even if the date was not calculated from the date of termination of the job, but from the date of his release from jail, the notice of complaint Was banned for almost two months The request for any complaint was not heard, as long as the notice of complaint served
