Section 33 and 47 Change of Birth Date of Employee Complaint Request Employee requested the employer bank to change its date of birth from 1 1951 to 195 1954 and rejected the employee's request at the record bank, which rejected the federal Appealed before Service Tribunal, dismissed, and Employees not challenged Service Tribunal decision in Supreme Court, finalized employee claiming to be an employee, with application in bio-data form The complaint was submitted; the employee himself stated his date of birth. 1951 In addition to this employee's report of his inclusion, the same date of birth and matriculation certificate was shown on the record of all the documents submitted by the employee, which was to be inserted in 1951 after the date of birth. Was told after. After nearly 20 years of service, this employee is convinced that his birth date is incorrectly entered in his matric certificate, which is allowed to do so. n Issued within just two years of joining the employment and otherwise not, the employer bank did not discriminate as there is no other instance of a situation where the bank has given the birth date of another employee. Was changed. Or the employee was rightfully rejected by the Labor Court for concrete reasons for such delay, the appeal against the Labor Court decision was dismissed, in the circumstances
