AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE (AMRI) versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD
Section 33 and service 47 removal complaint application was dismissed by the employee because his appointment was illegal, defective and the employee removed his complaint on the basis of his violation of the rules. Demanded that he fall prey to the trade union. Without regular investigation against it, and no opportunity for a personal hearing, there was nothing to show that the domestic investigation was conducted by the employer's department, the employee was condemned, not heard, For the employer, which was not valid in the opinion of the employer that the decision / order was not speaking, the decision was irrelevant, as the implication of the implied decision was very high as the Labor Court discussed every aspect of the matter. And cited the law of the matter according to which the Labor Court declared the verdict invalid and in the absence of any A defect or weakness, has maintained the same conditions
