Section 41 and (55 (cial) Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance (VI 1968)), Section O15 Compulsory Retirement Employing a Complaint Complaint Complaint for Fines That Charges Some Employees Was filed, filed a complaint. The application, which was partially allowed by the Labor Court to replace the termination of employment with all the benefits that the employee must accept under the employment rules as a mandatory retirement after his dismissal, The claim asserts that the bank-imposed penalty was in line with the employee's gravity of the charges against the employee, which did not guarantee any interference by the Labor Court, before the Inquiry Officer charged the employees. After admitting, his plea that he was forced to sign the document came from the audit officer, the responsibility employee. The traditional and stock answer to the election was to do its job ies as as cas court as cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas cas labor labor labor labor labor labor labor labor. Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor had rightly worked as a laborer through the Labor Court because the employer bank failed to provide any evidence that a power of attorney was issued to the employee even Otherwise a cashier's duties are always manual and he has no supervisor, administrator or supervisor. The executive power delay in issuing the charge sheet was explained, otherwise even in the case of major irregularities, the process could not be ruled out on the basis of technical objections; two other bank employees, who had similar charges,
