Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CENTRAL CIVIL DIVISION-II, PAK PWD, versus MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 22A (8) (G) and 22D Revision unfair labor practice was designated as a job officiating Mr Fore who was promoted as a foreman, but later I was terminated by his Promotion Authority and the employee was turned back to his original. The employee of the Mistry employee alleged that his return was due to his trade union activities and that the employer had committed unfair labor in his return, the employee was not able to prove to the employee Has returned due to its trade union activities. Even in his application, there is no mention of the employee having a special case in any particular forum, except for the general allegations against him for reversal under section 22A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Was done, but not before the National Industrial Relations Commission, because the jurisdiction of the Commission was limited only to unfair labor and had no general jurisdiction. immigration advocates phone number from Toru lawyer