Supreme Court — Judgments of 1980
375 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1980 — page 2 of 4.
- SADIQ ALI v. IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN 1980 PLD 222
(14 (1A) [as amended by the Land Settlement (Amendment) Act (1973 by the L.V. of 1973)) in the light of all relevant records, including the evacuation property information transfer record. The nature …
- RASOOL BUX v. STATE 1980 SCMR 225
Section 302 [murder case] Accused of confrontation evidence was arrested at the scene of murder and presented to police by witnesses, alleging that no evidence was presented to refute such evidence. ?…
- SHER AFZAL v. SHAMIM FIRDAUS 1980 PLD 228
Section Dec 42 Declaration of Plaintiff Plaintiff Defending Plaintiff Has Been Acting for the Respondent for 3 Years, that Defendant had committed illicit relations with a woman two years ago, but des…
- ABDUL RAUF v. STATE 1980 SCMR 247
Sections 302 and 304 (I) [murder case] Definition of evidence. In the Commandant Court, the evidence of the prosecution witness M and his statement under Section 164, material ments correction, the CC…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. MUHAMMAD SARWAR 1980 SCMR 254
Section 22, read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), o XXXII, the appointment of a guardian for the 3 pre-emption suits minor defendants, the application of section 22, the appointment of a guardia…
- AHMAD ALI MEMON v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 SCMR 260
Section 4, Proviso (An appeal against the final order of the competent authority filed on 3 197 1 1974, appealed against this order before the Tribunal was filed in June 1976, before being dealt with …
- MUHAMMAD SALEH v. MEHAR SHAH 1980 SCMR 261
Article 185 (3) read with the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O xxxxx Appeal to appeal should be requested on the request to stop the case, neither the case has been presented to the court nor the f…
- IBRAHIM KHAN, ADMINISTRATOR, UNION COUNCIL, BALOCHABAD, THARPARKAR v. MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LTD. 1980 SCMR 263
O XLVII, r 1 The facts of the judgment are not discussed before being heard by the High Court before this point is stated, in the sense of O XLVII, the error on the record does not exist, r 1 [ Overvi…
- QASIM DADA v. COLLECTOR OF KARACHI 1980 SCMR 265
Article 185 (3) read with the Land Acquisition Act (I9 1894), Section 23 (2) provides that no reasonable and fair application of the compensation awarded to the applicants found in the High Court was …
- UMAR DRAZ CHEEMA v. NAZAR MUHAMMAD 1980 SCMR 267
A. The principle of equity contained in r 7 of XXXXXI, r 7S XXXXI, should be followed; rent matters are the applicant's request was accepted, the application was converted to appeal and the constituti…
- STATE v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 1980 SCMR 268
Section 21 Luxei executes the first order for the Department of Inquiry to approve the litigation and a decisive action has been taken to appoint an inquiry officer in compliance with such order, in o…
- MUHAMMAD AZAM v. STATE 1980 SCMR 269
Section 7 49 arrest bail Pre-arrest points justify applicant's pre-arrest bail confirmation Orders of courts not to consider such matters are under trial, in this case relevant law applies. There are …
- HABIB RASOOL v. IHSANULLAH KHAN 1980 SCMR 270
The purpose of the additional tract retaining tract on the basis of Para 8 tractor ownership was purchased before the due date The fact of the registration of the tractor in the name of another person…
- SAEEDUR RAHMAN v. STATE 1980 SCMR 271
Article 188 reads with the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, AXXVI and the Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 [murder case] that all four witnesses in the case were unusual for the applicants and it i…
- STATE v. KOHISTAN 1980 SCMR 273
Appealed against Section 100 and Section 100 and Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), appeal of the defendant's self-defense trial raised by the accused in the section 411 murder appeal [criminal Appea…
- BAHADUR SHER v. LAL SHAH 1980 SCMR 277
Article 185 (3) reads with the West Pakistan Land Dispositions (Saving of Shamlat) Ordinance (of 1959), Section 3, defining relevant material for the purpose of finding the plaintiff whose purpose is …
- DIYAR KHAN v. SHER FARZAND 1980 SCMR 278
Article 185 (3) read with the Province Border Pre-Amendment Act (XIV of 1950), Section 5 (c) questions raised by the applicants have been concluded by the fact-finding by the courts that No justificat…
- SOHRAB KHAN KALWAR v. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH,DEPARTMENT OF FOOD 1980 PLD 279
8 5 (2), (3) For the recall of the Order of Inquiry, the Government should have the power to withdraw its orders, in appropriate circumstances, to withdraw the order made under R5 (2). The option shou…
- ABDUL QADIR v. LAHORE COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 1980 SCMR 280
Article 199 The right petitioner failed to voluntarily avail himself of the remedies available to him under the civil law; he did not have the quotas to retain the writ petition in the High Court, whe…
- ABDUR REHMAN v. MOHABBAT KHAN 1980 SCMR 282
Article 185 Special leave to appeal to the High Courts, including the High Court, on the merits of the case found in favor of the respondents, the petitioner did not contend that any prejudice was fac…
- N.J. SILK INDUSTRIES v. PRESIDING OFFICER, IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT 1980 PLD 283
Section 25 Provision of a Provincial Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O 12 (5), Section O 15 and Section 1 (4), Section II Provision of Industria…
- MUNTAZIM v. ASLAM KHAN 1980 SCMR 284
Section 27 (c) The value or value of the land actually received by the seller must be kept by the Registrar to prove that the transfer of money occurred in the presence of it and the presence was not …
- KASHMIR POTTERY WORKS, SIALKOT v. THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE 1980 PTD 285
Section 17 (1) and notification number 9 dated 27 6 1951, item 24 constitution…
- QURESHI BROTHERS v. KHAIRPUR TEXTLE MILLS LTD. 1980 PLD 286
Article M 85 Mutually Open and Current Account Respondent and Appellant work together in two different capacities, namely, Principal and Agent, and Seller and Buyer and each other seeking to consolida…
- JANAT v. DAULAT KHAN 1980 SCMR 287
An application for special leave against the High Court order retaining the allotment of land to an informant under Article 188 Settlement Law has already been dismissed.…
- GHULAM HAIDER v. STATE 1980 SCMR 289
Article 185, read with the Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 The Supreme Court generally does not interfere with the question of punishment until the sentence is passed by a legal sentence [sen…
- MUHAMMAD ISRAR NABI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 1980 PLD 292
No. 114, paragraph 3 (1) of the Punjab Administrative Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Sections 4 and 5 read responsibly despite the premature retirement civil service tribunal…
- RIAZ KHALIL v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ 1980 SCMR 294
Section 17 and 24 and the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), section 13 and 15 appeal against section 13 of the Ordinance of Section 17 Act, although the rent controller is u…
- AKBAR ALI v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 1980 PLD 295
Section 6 426 (1A), C1 (b) read with section 35 (3) for the purpose of appeal of the constitution guaranteed words Section 35 (3) for the purpose of appeal refers to the purpose with respect to any Re…
- HAYAT ALI v. AZIZA MAHMOOD 1980 SCMR 298
Sections 13 (6) and 15 resolve the question of whether the rental controller has a promise of default appeal eligibility…
- MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. ABDULLAH 1980 PLD 298
Sections 6, 7 and 13 Lease Illegal Terms The leaseholder's lease in the event of a leaseholder's failure to pay the rent permanently for three months, or in the event of his failure to provide the vac…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, ZONE `A\', LAHORE v. MESSRS STANDARD LEATHER WORKS 1980 PTD 300
Section 10 (3) Income Tax Reform and False Declaration Regulation [CMLA 19s 32 of 1968] and Circular No. MLR 1/69 [Circular No. MLR 3/69], paragraph 5, cl. (A) Amendment and Para 15, CL (B) Sales Tax …
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE v. MESSRS LAHORE TEXTILE & GENERAL MILLS LTD. 1980 PTD 301
Section 46 (1) allows the defendant to pay his income tax in installments by the Central Board of Revenue concerning a question whether to appeal against the penalty imposed on the respondents, the ho…
- NAZIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. STATE 1980 SCMR 301
Section 2 302 and [34 [murder case] definition of evidence. Witnesses do not have any enmity against the accused appellant, just as similar witnesses live in the same area, therefore, the consistency …
- ZARIN KHAN v. STATE 1980 SCMR 305
Section 497 (2) Bell Petitioner is suffering from chronic type asthma bronchitis, which has left pulmonary TB disease which causes the applicant to submit to a sick person within the meaning of sectio…
- ISLAMABAD CLUB v. PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.2 1980 PLD 307
5 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O 15 (4) Employees were given only one notice of misconduct with a request for complaint, but…
- ZARAR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1980 PLD 310
Article 24 & Government 24, Government Happiness Every government employee, although holding office during the government's pleasures, does not depend on his services as the chief of any action taken …
- ABDUL REHMAN v. MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN 1980 SCMR 311
Section 1 561 An Arrangement of Procedures That Arises Controversial Questions by the Applicant That Can Be Judged After Recording the Evidence - To Enter into such Controversial Questions and to Proc…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. STATE 1980 SCMR 313
Section 7 497 The accused applicant has been clearly named in the FIR by one of the alleged accused attackers even though such a report has been filed with the delay of two days complain of the compla…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD ALIAS GHULAMOON v. MAULA DAD 1980 SCMR 314
Article 19, read with Land Reform Regulation 1959 [64 of 1959], all that the applicant for sale of a par 25 allotted land did was to formally dissociate from the sale upon completion and consideration…
- MANZOOR AHMAD v. TASLIM HUSSAIN 1980 SCMR 315
Article 212 (1) read with the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 4 (1), the seniority ex parte decision periodically requiring the parties to take the test in accordance with the principles …
- ALI SHER v. THE STATE 1980 PLD 317
Section 302/34 [Case of Murder] Appeal to the prosecution witness's evil murder against the day-to-day light of the house is a case of eyewitness testimony, but it relates to the deceased and there is…
- KARAM ELABI v. MUHAMMAD ALAM 1980 SCMR 318
____O XVII, r 3 leave of appeal to the Supreme Court Chait while submitting the process fee for summoning a witness not present before the Supreme Court, given by the counsel of the applicant at trial…
- JALAL v. NAZIR AHMAD 1980 SCMR 320
Article 188 is being prosecuted again on merits as well as on additional grounds, which are excluded from the scope of the review application. Supreme Court Rules 1956, XXVI, [Review]…
- ABDUL LATEEF DAR v. DISTRICT ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE, SATELLITE TOWN, RAWALPINDI 1980 SCMR 322
Section 51, & 54 and Contract 55 Allotment of Contract, Termination of the dispute that the obligations of the parties are being paid and the Government has failed to fulfill the obligation to provide…
- PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES v. SINDH LABOUR COUTR NO.5 1980 PLD 323
Sections O 1 (b) and (e) permanent worker temporary workers expire within nine months, but in fact the workman who completes after nine months expires, only to be employed for more than nine months. C…
- HAQ NAWAZ v. SHAIQ HASSAN 1980 SCMR 324
Article 188 The reviewing applicant wishes to review the matter which resulted in the transfer of the respondents to a shop other than an article of litigation curator, however, he appeared personally…
- STATE v. NAYYAR MIRZA 1980 SCMR 325
Allow the appeal to be made by Article 3 parties, although it is important and complex in the aircraft and as a summary suggestion of the law in which the court has to consider a more appropriate case…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. SAEEDA BEGUM 1980 SCMR 327
Section 115 Stoepel applicant has been sleeping on the case for a long time and defendants are interested in valuable rights and property, stating that in fact the applicant had been unaware of the se…
- SHAHZADO v. STATE 1980 SCMR 328
Sections 7 307, 3 323 and 6 326 Evidence Evidence Evidence that once the High Court comes to conclude the alibi of the accused who survived the court, reacted to the whole case of such prosecution. An…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE 1980 PTD 329
In accordance with sections 2 (9) read in Sections 3 and 4, the West Pakistan Land Development Act (XV of 1949), under section 45 land development authority, is a local authority and is not responsibl…
- MIRZA KHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 1980 SCMR 330
The interim personal notice for the acquisition of section 9 (3) land notice was submitted to the applicant even though it has not been presented before the trial, yet the High Court is closely examin…
- ZAINAB KHATOON v. GHULAM FATIMA 1980 SCMR 331
Article 188 revision argument is considered advanced and the rehearing of the matter before it, cannot be held under the petition filed for review of the Supreme Court of Pakistan Rules 1956, [XX] [Re…
- ALI KHAN v. SHAH ZAMAN 1980 SCMR 332
The clause for clause and clarification for the delay in the application of the Section 5 found that the petitioner's counsel gave him ill-advised advice which is not endorsed by the affidavit of the …
- MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. MEHR MUHAMMAD 1980 SCMR 334
Section 497 was read against the bail of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 188; it was claimed by the accused that it was fully brought to the notice of the court (during the pre-p…
- REHMAT ALI v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI 1980 SCMR 336
Allow appeal on Article 3 (3) (1): (i) Settlement option required to serve applicants with acknowledgment registered with notice for payment of transfer cost (ii) confession in case file Non-affirmati…
- ABDUL RAZZAQ v. POSTMASTER GENERAL 1980 SCMR 337
Article 18 (185) Allow the appeal on the ground that the service tribunal has failed to examine the evidence to satisfy itself whether the allegations against the applicant have been proved and whethe…
- RAJ MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD ZAREEN 1980 SCMR 339
Applicants could not be satisfied that the withdrawal request was withdrawn because of the discussion of section 13 which made the application filing unclean and there is no jurisdiction to control th…
- MUHAMMAD HANIF v. GHULAM RASUL 1980 SCMR 340
Article 3 (3 ()) observes that the applicant asserts himself to be the owner of the property, asserting his former right to self-determination, and evaluating the applicant's conduct in deliberately w…
- KHADIM HUSSAIN v. STATE 1980 SCMR 342
Evidence for abductions in Articles 6 366 and 6 R6, definition of the age certificate prepared by the applicant, was found to be unrelated to the abductors and entries in relation to the abductors in …
- MOHAMMAD HANIF v. STATE 1980 SCMR 372
The substance of the argument raised during Article 188 review proceedings, in both cases, has also been dealt with principally and the details are also reviewed in the proceedings for review in the c…
- IKRAMULLAH v. SAID JAMAL 1980 SCMR 375
Section 4 Section 4 easily allows the filing, appeal or application of a court to reopen, if that period expires when the court closes the basic rule: the defendant or the applicant is discriminated a…
- MOHAMMAD NOOR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1980 SCMR 378
Article 4 ((())) allows the Medical College to appeal these objections to legality and to be bound by the merits of the principles not raised in the High Court alone and against the principles of such…
- AKBAR ALI v. ATIQ KHATOON 1980 SCMR 382
Article 30, Section 29 reads with the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), section 1 records that the landlord has not paid rent for more than six months after the tenant re…
- KUTYANA MEMON ASSOCIATION v. MUHAMMAD ZAFAR NABI KHAN 1980 SCMR 384
Article 185 (3) reads with the West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance Ordinance (VI of 1959), with participation in the evaluation and terms of the statement of Section 13 High Court and the First Ap…
- MUHAMMAD YUSUF v. NAFEESA KHATOON 1980 SCMR 385
Rehabilitation (Hanafi School) Rehabilitation arrears can be given under the Hanafi law.…
- FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. RASHID TEXTITLE MILLS LTD. 1980 SCMR 387
Article 185 (3) was read in conjunction with the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), the section 25A point which was petitioned by the applicant before the Labor Appellate Tribunal and the…
- MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM CHIRAGH MUHAMMAD v. PAKISTAN 1980 SCMR 388
Article 185 is allowed to consider special leave for appeal, should the High Court not have sought remand for further and better evidence on the issue of damages. And on appeal remand to decide the ap…
- WAHIDUDDIN v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 390
Article 212 reads with the Sindh Civil Servants Act (XV of 1973), section 5 (2) (b) whether the record should be presented in any case, which includes any special question of the law of public importa…
- ABDUL MAJID v. STATE 1980 SCMR 391
Section 185 was read with a partial code (XLV of 1860), special leave was granted for appeal of section 297 to examine the argument that there was no evidence to prove that the accused had performed t…
- THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT v. MUNAWAR ALI 1980 PLC(CS) 393
Arbitration of appeal against the decision of Article 212 (3) Administrative Tribunal is only valid where the Supreme Court is satisfied that it contains an important question relating to the law of p…
- MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. HAJRA BI 1980 SCMR 394
The Award 30 Award, keeping the words aside, makes a mistake in the face of the award in the section in ???? meaning that the arbitrator has stated no reason for his success, the award-like sphinx was…
- ALLAH RAKHA v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 1980 PLC(CS) 397
Article 185 (3), read with the Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), cannot be legally objected to the transfer and deployment of a section 9 civil servant to a place where it is currently deployed…
- MUHAMMAD SHAMSHAD v. ALLAH RAKHA 1980 SCMR 397
O XXXIV, with OX, read RR 7 and 9, O XXXIV and therefore, R 9 of O XXXI V cannot be implemented in such a case as the trial court remanded to amend the order [Decree]…
- Ch. MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 399
Section 4 (b) (1), an order of the Prosecco Pro Pharma Promotion Department authority that determines fitness or that another person may be appointed or appointed to a particular position, or to a hig…
- MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 SCMR 400
Arts 185 and 212 (3) Holiday grants to examine academic questions [Supreme Court practice and procedure] not practiced…
- NADIR SHAH v. STATE 1980 SCMR 402
Changes to the joiner charges of Articles 222, 227, 228, 233 and 234 separate charges and separate trials are required for each separate offense but such general rules are subject to certain exception…
- S, M. YOUSUF v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1980 SCMR 411
Schedule, read with paragraph 13 (3), 14 and section 10 notification number 10593 PI RA / 60, was sent to the vacant inspection on 24th June, 1960 by transfer notification, on which the Chief Settleme…
- SAID MIAN v. SAID BAGHDAD 1980 SCMR 420
Arts 185 (3) and 187 arrest detention authority after acquittal of the appeal to the Supreme Court, ordering detention or arrest of the accused during the approval of the appeal, to be acquitted under…
- MUHAMMAD STEAMSHIP CO. LTD. v. A. R. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ 1980 SCMR 432
Article III, r 2 and Article IV, r 2 (m) Carrier, proof of liability for damage to the cargo was damaged after the ship was aboard the cargo ship, Article IV during the ship's ounce shift Was able to …
- SHAMSHAD AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 SCMR 440
Read RR 12 (c), 21 and 22 along with section 29 (c), section 29 (c) of the National Guards Act (1973), to see the fulfillment of the required conditions for the prospectus enrolled in section 4 of the…
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ 1980 SCMR 443
Sections 4 and 6 and the West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Amendment) Ordinance (XVI of 1975), Section 2 law defining WAPDA employees, eliminating the application of Act LXX of 1973…
- MUHAMMAD YAR KHAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-POLITICAL AGENT,LORALAI 1980 SCMR 456
The facts arising from the analysis of sections 3, 6, 8, 16,17 and 21, will be followed by the analysis of sections 3, 6, 8, 16, 17 and 21 of the Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951. And \ Permanent Residen…
- MUNSHI v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE 1980 SCMR 466
O XLI, r 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), appeal to read with Article 185 (3), re-hearing of both the courts below the acceptance of personal affidavit filed by the relevant Advocate, to be submitt…
- SHAHUL HAMID v. TAHIR ALI 1980 SCMR 469
Section 11 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 23, Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 44 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 4 (1) Arguments against the Law Judeta Waiver Section 11; Civil Proc…
- ALI KHAN v. STATE 1980 SCMR 474
Sections 367, 429, 148 and 149 (murder case) were commended shortly after the testimony of the accused escaped after this incident, and after one year his property was placed under attachment, after h…
- MUHAMMAD SAEED v. ABDUR RAZZAK 1980 SCMR 480
Article 185 The applicant is unable to concede to the harmony adopted by the courts under which the courts have misunderstood and there is no justification for interference with such a view.…
- BAKHIR v. STATE 1980 SCMR 481
Section 302 reads with the argument of the murder of Section 149 that the evidence of the members of the police party should not be accepted and the unauthorized arrest of others is confronted by the …
- MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. DR. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 1980 SCMR 483
Section 13 (2) (vi) Preparation of Property Reconstruction Property Construction or Approval Plan for Reconstruction Only the law requires the letter to be sent to the municipal authority. Being deeme…
- NATHEY KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1980 SCMR 485
Section 24 Right to Limit Suit for Compensation Appellant's Worker's Train to be Disconnected by Train A cause of action for non-economic damages, citing a workable wrong, the sole reason for suing fo…
- ABDUL RASHID v. SALEH MUHAMMAD 1980 SCMR 506
Section 13 ()) Personal Requirements Three Courts that are proprietary evidence of the landlord and the landlord has required the shop for their personal eligibility. The fact is that there is no ques…
- ABDUL AZIZ v. MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB 1980 SCMR 509
Sections 7 and 10 have been granted powers under Section 10 General and the provincial government has the authority to issue a statement of conditions for a grant of a government land, while the origi…
- SARFRAZ ALIAS FARAZA v. STATE 1980 SCMR 513
There is no evidence on Articles & Sections 3002 and 2 302 [murder case] that records that the deceased Bailiff used any derogatory language against the accused appellant or his father appellant in an…
- QAMAR DIN v. K. TALEH BEGUM 1980 SCMR 516
??? Section 13 (2) (vi)? Withdrawal. Need to rebuild? What about the need for a premises to be rebuilt in a landlord application to evict a tenant? Held: Cannot remove request because it is not with m…
- MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. SHAMSUDDIN 1980 SCMR 519
Sections 13 and 15 were read with the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the second appeal was dismissed by the High Court when the AIX tenant did not appear for the appellant; The failure of the lawyer'…
- MUNEER AHMAD v. ALLAH DITTA 1980 SCMR 521
Sections 13 and 15 Determine facts for personal use by the courts below to determine the facts and any wrongdoing or evidence supported by the landlord verifying the circumstances required in good fai…
- SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. STATE 1980 SCMR 522
Article 7 377 The High Court, while accepting the State Appeal against the acquittal of the accused by the Sessions Judge, should consider the leave to appeal in the Supreme Court against the sentence…
- DOST MUHAMMAD v. HAQ NAWAZ 1980 SCMR 525
The S18 Joint Suit is pre-emptor by two pre-kings, claiming it has more rights, the other pre-emptor, thus, does not lose its right to pre-sale the dispute.…
- N. M. KHAN v. DR. ABDUR RAUF 1980 SCMR 528
Supreme Court appointed local commissioner to verify two houses in disputed property transfer dispute cannot be accepted…
- SIND EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION v. GREAVES COTTON & CO. (PAK.) LTD. 1980 SCMR 529
Section 2 (I1) \ Establishment Ordinance Extension to a Establishment by Notification Question regarding the provisions of the Ordinance, the Supreme Court and the case need not be reviewed in the cas…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.